Fehlermeldung vs. UUCP Was: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours
Vielleicht sollte sich da wirklich mal wer mit UUCP beschaeftigen und nicht so einen schrott wie diesen configurieren :) Flo - Forwarded message from <MAILER-DAEMON@widukind.bi.teuto.net> ----- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:38:35 +0100 From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@widukind.bi.teuto.net> Message-Id: <200001211738.SAA15737@widukind.bi.teuto.net> To: <flo@rfc822.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="SAA15737.948476315/widukind.bi.teuto.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (warning-timeout) Sender: MAILER-DAEMON@noose.gt.owl.de ********************************************** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ********************************************** The original message was received at Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:03:52 +0100 from noose.gt.owl.de [62.52.19.4] ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors ----- <andreasb@ab.teuto.de> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- <andreasb@ab.teuto.de>... Deferred: No route to host Warning: message still undelivered after 4 hours Will keep trying until message is 5 days old Reporting-MTA: dns; widukind.bi.teuto.net Arrival-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:03:52 +0100 Final-Recipient: RFC822; andreasb@ab.teuto.de Action: delayed Status: 4.4.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; ab.teuto.de Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:38:35 +0100 Will-Retry-Until: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:03:52 +0100 Return-Path: <flo@rfc822.org> Received: from noose.gt.owl.de (noose.gt.owl.de [62.52.19.4]) by widukind.bi.teuto.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26353 for <andreasb@ab.teuto.de>; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:03:52 +0100 Received: by noose.gt.owl.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id DC67E7D9; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:03:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by paradigm.rfc822.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 34DE18FC4; Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:42:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:42:42 +0100 From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> To: Andreas Bredenkötter <andreasb@ab.teuto.de> Cc: s-ladwig@gmx.de, falk <falk@itbnet.de>, linux@lug-owl.de Subject: Re: Provider Message-ID: <20000121114242.A297@paradigm.rfc822.org> References: <00011918473200.01872@Heim> <38863CCB.700E6741@ab.teuto.de> <m3d7qxct6x.fsf@bielefeld.netsurf.de> <38878F80.311A324A@ab.teuto.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <38878F80.311A324A@ab.teuto.de>; from Andreas Bredenkötter on Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:43:12PM +0100 Organization: rfc822 - pure communication Sender: flo@rfc822.org On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 11:43:12PM +0100, Andreas Bredenkötter wrote:
aber doch nicht als privater nutzer, oder?
Doch, ich bin so verrückt. Als Mail-Domains laufen auf meinem Serverchen hier ab.teuto.de und elverdissen.net. Allerdings pollt der Server nur 2x am Tag, daher gelegentlich Fehlermeldungen. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Wie kommt es dazu - Und jetzt sach nich das du sowas wie ETRN machst ? Am besten noch auf eine Exchange gurke ? Flo -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5241-470566 "Technology is a constand battle between manufacturers producing bigger and more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots." ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5241-470566 "Technology is a constand battle between manufacturers producing bigger and more idiot-proof systems and nature producing bigger and better idiots."
Teilnehmer (1)
-
Florian Lohoff